Archive for the ‘Cremation’ Category

Funeral Homes and More Deathcare on Twitter

Monday, December 7th, 2009

Oh for Twitter in 1900!

Oh for Twitter in 1900!

A few months ago we posted a list of Twitter users who focused on deathcare; but, we did not post funeral homes, as only two were listed at the time. As you can see from the list shown below, the funeral home business is catching on to Twitter! Many of these businesses have discovered that Twitter provides a great format to post links to obituaries.

The links lead to the Twitter page for each user. You need a Twitter account to respond to these users, but you do not need an account to read their “Tweets,” or their posts on their Twitter pages. The list is categorized and each link is listed alphabetically to show that we do not favor one resource over another.

Before you get in a huff about not being mentioned in the list below, we posted links to Twitter users who have posted within the past month and who have more than one Tweet on their page…if that description doesn’t fit you, then you weren’t listed.

Funeral Homes

  • Amos Family Funeral: Located in Shawnee, Kansas, this is a family-owned funeral home with on-site crematory. This funeral home also provides ShawneeObits (which we think is a great idea!).
  • Amos Pet Crematory: We had to make this a separate listing, although it seems that Amos is famous for taking care of lifeless bodies (see above).
  • Bannan Funeral Home: You can get all your obits from Alpena, Michigan through this Twitter site.
  • Barranco Funeral: This is a family-owned funeral home located in Severna Park, Maryland.
  • Baue Funeral Home: The folks in St. Charles, Missouri, can count on this funeral home to offer plenty of local news and photos.
  • Corey Gaffney: Mr. Gaffney is the general manager and funeral director at Gaffney Funeral Home in Tacoma, Washington.
  • Fisher Funeral Home: This funeral home, located in Logansport, Indiana, publishes links to obits as well as some great observations.
  • Funeral Queen: Muneerah Warner is the funeral director of Warner Funeral Home and CEO of Eternal Enterprises, Inc.
  • Gaffney Funeral Home: Located in Tacoma, Washington, this site focuses on seminars and holiday observations.
  • Hans Funeral Home: This funeral home also publishes obits. They are located in Albany, New York.
  • Herr Funeral Homes (Sunset Hill): This funeral home puts the “fun in funeral home!” They are located in St. Louis metro east.
  • John W. Evans: This guy goes by the Twitter ID, “Gottagosometime.” He’s currently the owner of Evans Funeral Home in Norwalk, Ohio and Secretary and Treasurer-elect for the Ohio Funeral Directors Association.
  • Miller Funeral Home: Located in Sioux Falls, South Dakota, this funeral home provides some interesting facts and quotes.
  • NewportFunerals: Brown Funeral Home has been serving families in Newport and Cocke County, Tennessee for over 78 years. Now, they’re on Twitter!
  • Roberts Funeral Home: This funeral home is located in Forest Lake, Minnesota, and they post obits.
  • Ryan Funeral Home: This funeral home is located in De Pere, Wisconsin.
  • Searcy Funeral Home: Located in Enterprise, Alabama, this funeral home offers local obituaries.
  • Sunset Funeral Home: Sunset Funeral Homes Memorial Park and Cremation Center is located in Danville, Illinois.
  • The Pet Funeral Home: This Canadian pet funeral home provides readers with pets as well as with pet funerals.

Other Deathcare Twitterers

  • Cross-Lanes Floral: Although not necessarily focused on funerals, it’s nice to see a florist become involved with Twitter. This florist is located in West Virginia.
  • Funeral Home Jobs: If you want to work in a funeral home, you might want to follow this Twitter user.
  • MrFrost71: A Kentucky-based funeral home employee Tweets away (he also Twitters about other things).
  • Sacred Crossings: This Twitter user represents the Los Angeles-based business that helps users practice at-home funerals.

Burn the Trash, Bury the Treasure?

Saturday, November 14th, 2009

grave

I recently ran across several online documents produced by Orthodox Christians that objected to the practice of cremation. One, in particular, was written by Fr. John Touloumes and posted online in 2007. While is it ascertained in the beginning that the Orthodox Christian Church prohibits cremation, the document posted explains why.

The points from that document are as follows:

  • The document states that the practice of cremation is on the rise, partly due to the influence of Oriental religions and neo-paganism and buoyed by the erosion of the traditional beliefs among non-Orthodox Christians.
  • The Orthodox conviction that the Son of God was also truly Man and was raised in His whole human nature – body and soul – explains the Church’s traditional rejection of cremation, a practice which is diametrically opposed to the expectation of the resurrection of the dead in Christ.
  • Throughout church history and through the Resurrection, Jesus makes abundantly clear that the whole of our humanity – body as well as soul – has been called to salvation and eternal life.
  • The Church knows innumerable accounts of healing occurring upon being blessed with the relics of a saint. These men and women lived the life in Christ so fully that not only were their souls taken to heaven but their bodies retain the sanctity and healing power of the presence of the Holy Spirit.
  • The Church has unequivocally taught since Christ’s Crucifixion that the proper way to treat the dead is a reverent burial of the body in the context of a proper Church funeral and prayers for those who have fallen asleep in the Lord.

Finally, the article ends with this statement:

The Broad Picture Acceptance of cremation, therefore, would represent a radical departure from an established practice for which there seems to be no adequate reason to institute a change. The argument that cemeteries waste space does not stand in a nation as immense as our own, especially when the universality of modern transportation makes burial sites away from urban centers easily accessible. The sky-rocketing cost of burial is not seen at this time as a compelling reason to sanction cremation, for the Church does not ask that funerals be extravagant and costly, but that a certain amount of respect be maintained for the human body that was once the temple of a human soul. Thus the Church, due to a pastoral concern for the preservation of right beliefs and right practice within the Tradition of the Fathers, and out of a sense of reverence for its departed, must continue its opposition to this practice. Each Orthodox Christian should know that since cremation is prohibited by the canons [rules of the Church], those who insist on their own cremation will not be permitted a funeral in the Church. Naturally, an exception occurs when the Church is confronted with the case of some accident or natural disaster where cremation is necessary to guard the health of the living. In these special situations, the Church allows cremation of Orthodox people with prior episcopal permission and only by “economia.”

On the other hand, another religious leader questions embalming. While he states on the front end that “burial is far better, that cremation can send an unintended message that the body will not be resurrected, that it has Pagan origins, and that, by contrast, a body laid out in a casket is both a testimony of the law, and tangible evidence of the Gospel in the form of bodily resurrection,” embalming seems to shake this minister’s soul:

…one of my members (a former funeral director) threw me a curve-ball.

He argues that the modern method of embalming (which also has roots in Pagan Egypt) is itself a desecration. This is obviously something most of us never see. Blood is drained and thrown away. Parts of flesh even end up in the garbage. The body is filled with harsh chemicals. And all of this is to avoid the process of decomposition (Gen 3:19) that was spoken by God to Adam as part of the wages of sin.

His argument is that cremation – by avoiding the chemicals, the draining of fluids, the removal of flesh, and the mingling of the Christian’s flesh and blood with the garbage – is instead subjecting the body to a process that hastens the Gen 3:19 process, and is actually less of a desecration than embalming.

Be sure to read the comments posted below the second article as well as comments provided by readers who discuss cremation through any searches you might find when you look for “Orthodox Christian cremation.” You might discover that the arguments provided by the church may not seem popular, but they offer fodder for thought among readers. This is a good thing – for people to think about burial and what it means to their ideals and belief systems.

But, the church is not the only obstacle for those devout believers who also believe that cremation, when done with reverence, is an option for burial. In some cases, such as the one offered by Michigan funeral director, Thomas Lynch, in the book, Caring for the Dead: Your Final Act of Love, the funeral director might prove an obstacle. In that book, Lynch is noted for his “subtle and not-so-subtle disdain for those who opt for anything other than the elaborate, body-on-display funeral he unabashedly glorifies.” Cremation as a caring choice, according to author Lisa Carlson, is “beyond his bias to understand.”

His statement, which has been echoed by several church leaders over the past few years, clearly marks cremation is something that only the ‘unclean’ would choose when he stated, “We burned the trash and buried the treasure.”

How do you feel about this stance?

DeathCare Workers Talk about What Happens After Death

Sunday, October 4th, 2009
What happens when you die

What happens when you die

Have you ever wondered what happens to your body after death, especially if you have not planned your funeral? The Guardian ran an article in the U.K. in 2008 entitled, “What Really Happens When You Die,” and this article provides death care workers’ perspectives on their jobs and what those jobs entail. The entire article is worth reading, but a few points from that article are listed below. Remember that these interviews were conducted in the U.K., where some practices carry small differences between those in the U.S.

The General Practitioner

The good doctor talks about how people die in the U.K. Mostly it is in a bed, but many people die from massive heart attacks and lung clots on the toilet, because those fatal occurrences also include the feeling that the person wants to defecate. Special occasions, such as birthdays and holidays also provide higher death rates. This doctor feels that people want to hang on for these occasions, whereas in the state, many people feel that holidays provide too much stress for some people. He also states:

When a death is expected, the ideal place for it is at home, in a familiar environment, surrounded by family. But that is becoming a rarer event. What is becoming more common is people being rushed into hospital for what I believe is a more undignified and worse death, in an anonymous room with nurses who are busy. In my view that is a failure of health professionals, because we should be preparing the families of terminally ill people for death, showing them that it doesn’t have to be frightening and that they can do it at home. Palliative care is all about making death comfortable – you do not need to die in pain, you can die in a dignified manner. People worry that having a death at home will be horrible and traumatic for the family, but a good death is like a good birth – it is a beautiful event, not at all undignified.

The Pathologist

We covered most of the information found in this interview in our coverage of autopsies (see also: Autopsy: The External Examination). However, the pathologist also talks about causes of death:

Most people who come to me for a postmortem examination will have died from heart disease. In the elderly, strokes and pneumonia are also very common. The young are more likely to die from accidents, suicide or particular types of tumors one gets in youth. If a young person dies, the likelihood of them having a postmortem is high because their death is much more likely to be unexpected. Many older people who die won’t have a postmortem because they are likely to have had a known illness that has led to their death.

The Funeral Director

This interview is interesting, as the funeral director talks about various death and funeral practices. Since he works in East London, where cultural diversity is strong, he also talks about sending bodies back home and how this return is safeguarded by embalming:

A lot of my work is arranging for bodies to go back to their home abroad. About a fifth of our work is repatriation now because of the cultural diversity of the area we are based in – east London. This requires tropical embalming because the body may be kept for longer. Tropical embalming takes longer and uses stronger chemicals. Ghanaian funerals, for example, can be anything from two months to two years after death. We’ve had bodies here for three or four months before they’ve been flown home to Africa for the funeral.

The Embalmer

This interview is interesting, as this embalmer also dresses bodies for funerals. So, talk about how to make the person look ‘natural’ is included. A few myths also are debunked here, such as the myth that your nails keep growing after you are dead – what actually happens is that your skin retracts, so they appear longer. What is shocking is the percentage of bodies that are embalmed. According to this interview:

Of the bodies that come to the funeral homes I work in, around 90 percent will be embalmed. The ones that don’t will be where the family have refused or the funeral is taking place very quickly…If a body is going abroad, the strength and amount of fluid used is increased, to ensure preservation and sanitation for a longer period.

The Crematorium Technician

This is, perhaps, the most interesting interview, as this crematorium technician talks about how this industry is regulated in the U.K.:

The cremation chamber is fuelled by gas and has to be heated to at least 750C before we can load, or “charge”, the coffin. We have to adhere to strict guidelines and everything is logged automatically on the computer – time, date, duration, emissions, smoke levels, carbon monoxide, oxygen levels and the temperature in the different parts of the cremator. The computer prints out a report and every few months these are sent to environmental health.

This person also presents a problem with ‘natural’ burial containers:

People think wicker and cardboard coffins are saving the planet, but they burn very quickly instead of creating a slow, even heat like wood. That means you need more heat to cremate the body, so use more gas. It’s also more hazardous for us, because they catch alight so quickly and harder on us because we can sometimes see the body through the wicker.

The Cemetery Operations Manager

U.S. burial practices are far different than those in the U.K., because the U.S. offers more space (currently) for cemeteries. Therefore, more people can be buried in one plot in the U.K.:

If a person buys a grave plot, they have a choice of that grave being used for anything between one and five people. For a single grave, the law requires that the coffin be buried under at least 3ft of earth, unless the ground conditions are suitable and then the shallowest a coffin can be buried is beneath 2ft 6in of soil. The ideal is light, dry soil, not wet, heavy clay. With a grave for five people, the first person would be buried at 11ft and the next coffin would go in at 9ft 6in and so on. You have to have at least six inches between each coffin in a multiple grave.

Note the distances between the coffins above and then hear what this person says below about shallow graves. In the U.S., more stories are appearing where graves are being dug too shallow to skimp on burial costs, and these shallow graves can cause problems. Also note the time it takes for a skeleton to decompose – this is a generalization based upon a body in a coffin in ideal conditions. Some bodies take longer to deteriorate (even with embalming), and in some conditions, bodies take much less time to decompose:

If a body were buried illegally in a shallow grave less than 2ft deep, the decomposition rate is only 18 months to three years. That’s banking on disturbance by small mammals and insects. Whereas, with a proper burial, with the coffin deep in the ground, the decomposition rate is much slower. The ground conditions affect the decomposition rate. If the coffin is sealed in a very wet, heavy clay ground, the body tends to last longer because the air is not getting to the deceased. If the ground is light, dry soil, decomposition is quicker. Generally speaking, a body takes 10 or 15 years to decompose to a skeleton.

The Resomation Technician

You may not be familiar with the term, resomation, or the work it entails, but it has come about thanks to interest in an alternative to cremations. During resomation, the coffin is placed in a special chamber and, instead of fire, a water- and alkali-based method is used to advance the natural process of decomposition. According to this technician:

At the moment there are only a few resomation chambers in operation in the world, all of them in the US – ours is at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota – but there has been interest from several UK councils and cemeteries about installing them. It does offer people a greener option…It [the process] breaks down the body and neutralizes everything, including the chemicals used to preserve the body, such as formaldehyde.

And, if you ever wondered what you were made of, this technician will tell you:

…nitrogen, phosphate, proteins, amino acids, salts and sugars. It’s [the remains] got a greenish-brown tint and it flows just like water.

Uber-Geek Funeral Ideas

Friday, October 2nd, 2009
TARDIS

TARDIS

Are you a geek? If so, you probably read Slashdot and you learned about the guy who went through the effort to put his brother’s cremains into a SPARCstation. Here is his post:

“I’ve not seen this topic covered here before even though it’s one that will concern us all at some time: what to do with our corporeal remains after we’ve left for that great data bank in the sky. For my recently departed brother (long illness, don’t smoke!), I thought this nice SPARCstation would be a cool place to spend eternity. Yes, he’s really in there (after cremation). I kept the floppy drive cover but for space reasons removed the floppy drive, hard drive, and most of the power supply. I left behind the motherboard and power switch and plugs to keep all openings covered. The case worked quite well at his memorial party. His friends and family were able to leave their final good-byes on post-notes. Anyone who wanted to keep their words private could just slip their note into the case through the floppy slot. All notes will be sealed in plastic and placed within the case. There has been one complication. His daughters like the look of it so much they aren’t now sure if they want to bury him. One more thing: the words on the plaque really do capture one of the last things he ever said. Of course as kids we watched the show in its first run.”

Of course, if you read Slashdot, you also need to read any comments made after a story. The comments often hold the real meat of any story in that Web site. In this case, we discovered at least three more stories within the comments – but instead of dragging this story out, we’ll just add some links to help you learn more about some uber-geek funeral ideas.

  • We learned that the “cocoon” is a favorite coffin for some readers, and that design can be found at UONO Coffins.
  • We also witnessed a debate about Cryonics, or the attempt to preserve and protect a body once a person has died in hopes that freezing a body one day will become reversible. Once company mentioned in the comments was Alcor.
  • As a Star Trek fan, how could you pass up an urn or casket designed specifically for Star Trek fans? Eternal Image holds these items at their Web site.
  • If you wonder what a TARDIS is, just read about this object at Wikipedia. For a short description, the TARDIS (Time And Relative Dimension(s) In Space) is a time machine and spacecraft in the British science fiction television program, Doctor Who. An image of the TARDIS is shown above.  According to one comment, a Doctor Who fan in the UK was buried in a coffin that resembled a TARDIS.

Finally, we had to include this comment, as it fairly wraps up some geeky thoughts about designing your own geek funeral: “My father actually has it written that he wants bagpipe music and Admiral Kirk’s speech about Spock from Wrath Of Khan at his funeral.”

Too Poor to Die? Some Solutions for a Funeral

Thursday, October 1st, 2009
The city morgue.

The city morgue.

CNN Money today ran a report on a Detroit morgue where bodies were beginning to pile up from various results of the recession. Without jobs, people cannot afford a cremation, let alone the cost of a traditional burial. So, they leave the bodies at the city morgue, where – eventually – funds derived from various sources (including from other taxpayers) will allow the city to dispose of the human remains. The answer to these neglected remains usually means a burial in a potter’s field or cremation.

But, lack of funds is not the only reason for accumulation of cast-off bodies in larger cities. Higher crime rates, suicides and other deaths that occur as the result of lost jobs and poor outlooks to the future also add to the human cost. Detroit isn’t alone in this battle. Other large cities and regions of the country are hurting.

Representative Tom Perriello from Southside Virginia, for instance, is fighting the withholding of unemployment fund extensions in states with unemployment rates under 8.5 percent, as a statewide survey doesn’t jive with what has happened regionally during this economic downturn. While Virginia’s unemployment rate is low at 6.5 percent, there are regions in his district where unemployment ranges from 15.3 percent to 22.1 percent.

In other words, large cities and even larger regions of the country are struggling to make ends meet. When the death of a loved one occurs, that problem looms even larger for surviving family members and for local mortuaries. According to the Detroit story, one couple – the Vickers – had to leave a beloved aunt behind until they found a resolution to their problem:

The state, however, does have some funds available to assist with burial costs. For fiscal year 2009, Michigan allocated $4.9 million for assistance, and of that, approximately $135,500 remains. Those in need of assistance can find grant applications at Michigan Department of Human Services offices, most funeral homes, and at Michigan.gov/dhs.

The Vickers did not know about the funds until CNNMoney notified them. But, fortunately, they were eventually able to scrape together the $695 and will be able to cremate their aunt with help from Social Security, social services and their aunt’s church.

The way Darrell [Vickers] sees it, the stimulus package should have helped people in situations like this, rather than to “spark the economy and sell cars. We can’t take care of our own when it comes to laying them to rest and letting them rest in peace.”

Outside of possible state funds in your area, Social Security, social services and your local church, you can opt for planning now for your funeral and using the only free option available to dispose of earthly remains – a full body donation. But, even this option is available only if you fit certain criteria (not obese, for instance) or if you make plans beforehand to choose which company or organization you’d like to use for the donation and take the time to understand their limitations and guidelines.

A full-body donation to science does not cost anything, and often the cremation is included in the services. Some companies may even offer to provide funds for a memorial service, although they cannot pay to take your body. Some institutions may not transport your body across state lines, however, so if you die in a state other than your resident state, your loved ones may need to pay for transporting your body. And, if your religious beliefs deter you from choosing this option, you cannot take advantage of the least expensive funeral option on the market today.

But, you can still plan ahead. Seek out funds available through your state or region. Talk with a funeral director to determine other options as well. If nothing else is available, then you know – at the very least – that the taxpayers will pay for your funeral if you don’t mind staying on ice for a while at your local morgue. Of course, as the deceased, you’ll never know this is your fate. But, your loved ones may suffer as a result.

Death and Comedy – Chelsea Lately Plans a Funeral

Friday, September 25th, 2009

One way to deal with death is through comedy. Chelsea Lately, an American late night comedy talk show host on the E! network is notable for her sarcastic approach to anything serious – including death. Chuy Bravo, her assistant, participates with Lately in this particular episode, where Lately tries on a casket on for size as well as some funeral make-up.

Outside the slapstick (and bad lipstick in the second half of the video), note that the funeral director suggests cremation rather than burial (to which Chuy responds, “I told you before – I’m afraid of fire.”), an option that many funeral homes today are pushing. In this video, however, Lately seems to push the funeral director almost into fits of laughter, if not into downright shock.

The final decision is a casket, along with a DJ and pony rides for kids. Unfortunately, the funeral director states he has no control over a slight drizzle or rain as a mood setter for the funeral, nor does he have a rain machine. But, he did make it through the comedy routine.

Germany’s Burial Traditions

Sunday, September 13th, 2009
The Invalidenfriedhof Cemetery, with the remains of the Berlin Wall in the background.

The Invalidenfriedhof Cemetery, with the remains of the Berlin Wall in the background.

Deathcare.com already offered a short article on American-German funeral traditions, which have become assimilated – for the most part – in American traditions based upon religious beliefs. But, in Germany, burial traditions often are different than those in other parts of the world, and have been so for generations. But, changes are in the works, and some of the following traditions also contain explanations of changes when known.

  • Cremation and embalming have, traditionally, been handled by the state rather than by funeral homes and survivors had no choice on what to do with cremated remains as they had to be buried in a cemetery. Germany has relented in some cases recently, as ashes may be scattered in cemeteries or taken out to sea beyond the three-mile limit and scattered.
  • Almost half of eastern Germany’s burials are what is known as “anonymous burial,” something unknown in the U.S. outside the Potter’s Field. Although the Catholic Church believes that anonymous burials are a trend away from religion, most opinions lean toward the expense of a grave marker and other funeral expanses as a reason to avoid traditional markers and other burial accouterments.
  • With the above said, German cemeteries now set aside a grassy plot for anonymous burials with one monument that states the purpose of this field without headstones. In opposition to the purpose of saving money through an anonymous burial, these cemetery plots cost more than the average plot, as it include perpetual care by employees rather than surviving family members.
  • Germany does allow two to four urns in a space that is required for one casket. In the U.S., you would be hard pressed to find a cemetery that would allow more than two urns in one burial space. Additionally, unlike the U.S., most German cemeteries currently do not require precautions to prevent contamination of groundwater by cremains.
  • German cemeteries are almost exclusively state- or church-operated, though exceptions are occasionally made for people with special religious needs. Muslims groups, for example, are permitted to have their own cemeteries. However, Germany has some of the strictest burial laws, many of which clash with Islamic burial rituals.
  • Plots are usually rented for a certain period of time, usually 20 to 30 years, with the possibility of an extension. Eventually the plot will be used for another burial, once the mourners themselves have passed away. In other words, don’t expect to remain buried in Germany for more than a generation.
  • Finally, German corpses seem to be obtaining revenge for re-using graves…the corpses are not rotting in some cases. The corpses are turning into mummified artifacts or grave wax, otherwise known as “adipocere.”

Sources:

The Greenest Cremation Possible…To Date

Monday, September 7th, 2009
US flags at the Columbiarium of the Arlington National Cemetery in Arlington, Virginia, near Washington DC, on Memorial Day.

US flags at the Columbiarium of the Arlington National Cemetery in Arlington, Virginia, near Washington DC, on Memorial Day.

While estimates about the number of cremations in upcoming years are increasing, other voices have chimed in to state that cremation is not a viable green alternative to traditional burials. While we have a solution or two that can help eliminate your contribution to mercury toxins if you choose cremation, other options seem less viable for those who want to be cremated upon death.

In fact, the National Funeral Directors Association (NFDA) has issued a “Green Funerals” document that states, “cremation is not considered ‘green’ because the cremation process uses nonrenewable fossil fuels, even though cremation does use fewer resources than conventional forms of disposition. Cremation also produces airborne emissions. However, cremated remains do not need to be interred in a cemetery, which reduces land use.”

If you think that this organization is denigrating cremation because they want to sell more caskets and vaults and cemetery spaces, you might be wrong. They also state, “In a ‘purist’ natural or green burial, the body is buried, without embalming, in a natural setting. Any shroud or casket that is used must be biodegradable, nontoxic, and of sustainable material. Traditional standing headstones are not permitted. Instead, flat rocks, plants or trees may serve as grave markers; some cemeteries use GPS to mark the locations of gravesites. A ‘natural or green burial’ may also simply mean burial without embalming, in a biodegradable casket without a vault, when permitted by a cemetery.”

Other companies and entities are approaching cremation in entirely different methods. For instance, Natural Pioneer Burial is somewhat unbiased about their perspectives on cremation as they state the toxins that are created during the cremation process, but they downplay the mercury issue. Still, their perspective is pointed toward the natural burial as an alternative to cremation.

In other cases, communities are denying funeral homes the prospect of adding crematories to take advantage of the rising rates in the cremation process, because they fear the chemicals that these facilities might unleash upon their communities.

But, if your wish is to be cremated, you can ask for various options that can make your cremation as green as possible. The removal of any mercury-filled teeth, as mentioned previously in the link above, is one option and the most concerning. Other options include:

  • Making sure all plastic prosthesis and plastic burial items are removed before burning. Burning plastic creates toxins such as dioxin.
  • Make sure that you are not cremated while wearing jewelry or other items that may create toxins during the cremation process.
  • Use a rental casket for a viewing, if that is your wish, and use a green alternative for the crematory. Such options include cardboard, bamboo or other natural product, an unfinished wood box that burns easily or a shroud. Talk with your funeral home or crematorium to learn your options. These materials will help to reduce the number and intensity of toxins released into the atmosphere during cremation.
  • Learn whether your local crematory uses filters to help keep toxins from entering the atmosphere. If not, then find another crematory that might be suitable and reasonable to use in your area.
  • Choose a simple and biodegradable urn for your cremains. This option is most viable for those who want to have cremains scattered or buried. Using a container such as this for a home display is not feasible, as a sturdier option would provide more security for your cremains.
  • Hope that you live long enough to see changes in this industry, which will be cost-effective and that will reduce or eliminate a number of pollutants.

How You Can Eliminate Mercury Toxins During Cremation

Sunday, September 6th, 2009
The material most commonly used to fill decaying teeth is known as dental amalgam, or a substance made by combining mercury with another metal.

The material most commonly used to fill decaying teeth is known as dental amalgam, or a substance made by combining mercury with another metal.

Is it possible to have a greener cremation, despite heavy metals and toxins emitted during the cremation process? Some states, funeral homes and other entities are striving to create the ‘greener’ cremation that helps to eliminate some problems that occur during this funeral process, but few of them are located in the U.S. The following information may help you to eliminate mercury emissions if you choose cremation as your burial option and if your mouth contains fillings that include mercury.

A 2007 article in the Minneapolis-St. Paul, Minnesota Star-Tribune defined the mercury problem succinctly:

Dental amalgam fillings (sometimes called silver fillings) contain mercury. As solids in the mouth, they are considered inert and not a hazard, but when exposed to high temperatures, the mercury vaporizes and becomes airborne, contributing to mercury pollution in the state and beyond.

While there isn’t a large amount of mercury in any one body, the state estimates that, all together, cremation emits about 80 pounds of mercury a year in Minnesota, said Ned Brooks of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. The aging baby boomer population tends to have lots of these fillings and as more people choose cremation, pollution isn’t expected to drop.

Just a little mercury released into the air can cause problems. Mercury makes its way through the food chain through fish and then into the people and wildlife that eat the fish. Mercury builds up in the human body, where it can harm the brain and nervous system. Young children, developing fetuses and breast-fed babies are most at risk. Once dispersed into the environment, mercury cannot be recovered.

A bill presented to the State Legislature last year would have required crematories to have a dentist remove fillings before cremation or add mercury-capturing equipment, but it did not become law.

“We are against [the bill] because it’s such a harsh thing to do,” said Waterston. Removing mercury-containing fillings is “not something we can do,” he said, adding “we could learn, if necessary.”

Those in the industry aren’t against mercury control, he said, but they want proof that the extra expense is warranted. They await study results that will quantify mercury emissions.

Many states now are seeking solutions to this mercury-toxin issue, and the 100-year-old mortuary science program at the University of Minnesota is seeking solutions on how to reshape a face once teeth are removed after death so the body is ‘presentable’ for viewing before cremation. However, legislation against mercury emissions is meeting resistance from funeral homes and crematories that do not want to remove teeth that contain mercury fillings. In some cases, the resistance is cost as filters used to trap mercury during the cremation process are not cheap. In others, “moral issues” are at stake. Some cite both reasons in rebuttal.

One solution is to go against the Food and Drug Administration’s advocacy for mercury fillings and use something else that might be safer for your health while you’re living and for everyone else’s health once you’re cremated. Composite fillings are an option. However, if you already have mercury fillings, you may meet resistance at removing those fillings from your dentist, especially since removal may expose you to more mercury poisoning unless the removal is done by an experienced dentist.

Other than using anything other than mercury for a tooth filling, what about options once you’ve died and you want to be cremated? You can make a wish in a will or in another document that you wish to have your teeth removed after death and before cremation. You may find this option is troublesome for many funeral homes, so research this option before you die…otherwise, this wish may create unneeded stress and unnecessary expense to your surviving loved ones.

Finally, search for a crematory in your area that sees mercury poisoning as a viable reason to remove your teeth before cremation, if they do not use filters to eliminate this toxin from the environment.

Unfortunately for U.S. citizens and fortunately for European residents, European entities have identified an increase in mercury in the environment around their crematories and have enacted legislation to protect their citizens. Currently, in this country, only you can provide a solution by either never using mercury fillings or by finding a funeral home or crematory that will remove your teeth before your cremation if you have mercury fillings in your mouth.

Greenwashing in the Cremation Industry

Sunday, September 6th, 2009
The cremator, where bodies are cremated in the Western world.

The cremator, where bodies are cremated in the Western world.

The Cremation Association of North America (CANA) is a Chicago-based industry group that has projected that 38 percent of all deaths this year will finalize in cremation. This is a 12 percent increase since 2000. Additionally, cremation rates are expected to rise to 50 percent over the next fifteen years.This news may prompt many funeral directors to expand their cremation services for those individuals who seek a simpler death care process that is less expensive than a traditional burial. But, for those funeral directors to tout this death care service as ‘green’ is – to put it bluntly – “greenwashing.”

Jay Westerveld coined the term, “Greenwashing,” in a 1986 essay that focused on the hotel industry. In this essay, Westerveld pointed to the hotel industry’s practice of placing green placards in each room that promoted reuse of guest-towels, ostensibly to save the environment. Instead, the hotels avoided recycling and used this green marketing to increase profits.

“Greenwashing” is a term that combines the words, “green” and “whitewash,” or a term used to describe the corporate practice of spinning products, services and policies as environmentally friendly when, in reality, that marketing is a veneer designed to fool consumers.

Cremation is a way to conserve land use, as some cemeteries will allow two bodies in one space when both are cremated. Or, the cremated remains can be placed in a building on cemetery property. Finally, the survivors of the deceased may take the deceased’s cremains to conserve them in a home, in a family garden or to scatter the cremains. Cremation also eliminates other, more traditional burial items that have been tagged as contaminants. These items may include caskets, vaults and the act of embalming.

Additionally, cremation allows for future conservation to a degree. Centennial Cemetery chief executive Bryan Elliott explains:

“This is because we must look after the gravesite for a number of years by watering and mowing the surrounding lawn area and maintaining the concrete beam on which the headstone is placed,” Elliott said. “Burial is a more labor and resource intensive process, consumes more fuels and produces larger quantities of waste than cremation” added Elliott.

But, the cremation process is not totally environmentally friendly, as crematory emissions include nitrogen oxides, carbon monoxide, sulfur dioxide, mercury, hydrofluoric acid, hydrochloric acid and some persistent organic pollutants. These emissions are created by three major sources – combustion, incomplete combustion and the volatilization of metals in the human body.

Nicholas Albery, Natural Death Centre director and an editor of The New Natural Death Handbook, wrote, “Anyone with green pretensions should think twice about cremation.” A portion of the air pollution created during cremation comes from the foam rubber mattress, polyester fabric, urethane finish and composite wood of conventional caskets.

With all this said, there are options that anyone can choose help to eliminate some of this pollution if cremation is the individual’s funeral option. Stay tuned over the next few days to learn more about how you can choose a more environmentally-friendly cremation option for your funeral. When you know your options, your chances of being “greenwashed” can become more limited.