Posts Tagged ‘Allow Natural Death’

Living Wills Could Save Money Nationwide

Thursday, June 25th, 2009

NHDD

NHDD

On April 19 this year, the nation celebrated its first National Healthcare Decisions Day (NHDD). The National Healthcare decisions Day was designed to help Americans understand that making future healthcare decisions includes much more than deciding what care they would or would not want regarding their health. This initiative also advocates “expressing preferences, clarifying values, identifying care preferences and selecting an agent to express healthcare decisions if patients are unable to speak for themselves.”

In other words, this initiative urges Americans to prepare documents that will clarify your intent, especially when you are not able to communicate this directive because you are incapacitated. While most documents that declare a “Do Not Resuscitate” order if you do not wish to be resuscitated or placed upon life support, many individuals now see this alternative as an AND, or “Allow Natural Death.”

Although advance directives cannot reduce medical expenses for all dying patients, some studies indicate that life-sustaining treatments and other forms of end-of-life care can be extraordinarily expensive and an unnecessary strain on healthcare resources. Each year, for instance, Medicare allocates approximately 30 percent of its funds to the five percent of recipients who pass away during that year.

According to an ABC News article:

According to a recent study by the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, America could reduce medical costs by $75 million a year if more cancer patients discussed living wills with their families or medical professionals before it became too late. Assuming these figures hold true for other groups of Americans, the potential national savings could be far greater.

Nathan Kottkamp, a healthcare attorney and founder of the initiative, boasts about the success of this year’s initiative that took place on April 16. According to new numbers, at least 3,755 people completed advance directive documents while the campaign exposed potentially millions of Americans to the organization’s message.

“[Living wills] save Americans money because we are more efficient,” Kottkamp emphasized. “This is not saving money because we are pulling the plug.” Furthermore, Kottkamp insists that reducing uncertainty in the medical process can “save tons of money by not involving lawyers.”

Government research, however, shows that living wills or DNR directives are not always effective. Roughly three quarters of physicians treating patients with advance directives were unaware they existed, and some doctors prefer to automatically resuscitate their patients to defend themselves from lawsuits. What can you do to make your wishes known?

Visit the NHDD Web site to learn more. This site also includes links to other sites that can help answer your questions. They also carry information on state-specific resources, although not all states are included.

Changing the Language of Death

Monday, April 27th, 2009

With the waxing popularity of hospice care for end-of-lfe support and health care, many hospitals, hospice or palliative care services and nursing homes are changing the language of death. In one specific incident, this language has changed from one of a negative connotation with a harsh reality to that of a positive tone and a natural process.

For years, do not resuscitate, or DNR, has been the designation for not prolonging life when a person’s heart stops beating or breathing stops. A new designation, allow natural death, or AND, is becoming the preferred term among some entities, including several hospitals within Lutheran Health Network.

Proponents of the AND designation say it creates for patients and medical staff a more positive approach. It is about what is allowed to occur as opposed to what is not to be done.

Sister Carole Langhauser, vice president of Mission Integration at St. Joseph Hospital. St. Joseph and Dupont Hospitals stated that this change is more than semantics – it’s a philosophy. After all, not one person escapes death, so why make it a negative experience for the dying and their loved ones?

Langhauser said physicians are embracing AND over DNR. A 2004 Hastings Center Report compared real-life accounts of two families dealing with end-of-life decisions. The family that was offered the option of signing DNR for a loved one in the event of cardiac arrest became upset and agitated. Another family facing the same dilemma but who was given the “allow natural death” option reported a better understanding of the option and the fact their loved one would be appropriately cared for.

If you’ve thought about your own death, how do you feel about the DNR? Would you want to put that onus on someone else if you were incapable of making a decision? Or, would you rather die a natural death in words, with those words imparting a philosophy to your loved ones that death is a natural part of life?

Either way, it’s the same process. The only difference is how it is worded.